top of page

The Safety Database Everyone Cites and Almost No One Reads Correctly

  • Aug 20
  • 2 min read

Updated: 4 days ago

MAUDE

Ask how safe a surgical robot is, and most answers point to the same source: a report count pulled from a database called MAUDE.


That number is real; what it's usually assumed to mean is not.


What MAUDE Actually Is


MAUDE, the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database, is the FDA's public collection of medical device reports on adverse events.


It holds the last ten years of reports, updated monthly, filed by manufacturers and hospitals when a device caused or may have contributed to a death, serious injury, or malfunction, plus voluntary reports from clinicians and patients.


What the FDA Itself Says You Can't Do With It


The FDA states directly that the incidence, prevalence, or cause of an event cannot be determined from this data alone, because of underreporting, inaccuracies, lack of verification that the device actually caused the event, and no information about how often the device is even used.


A report can contain the word death without being classified as one, it only counts that way if the person filing it believed the device contributed.


Report counts can't be turned into rates, and they can't be fairly compared across two different devices without knowing how many procedures each one has actually performed.


Why This Matters More for AI-Enabled Devices


Very few AI-enabled surgical devices currently have any MAUDE entries at all, and the database has no dedicated field to flag when a failure involved the AI component specifically.


That means even where reports do exist, there's often no way to tell an algorithm-driven error apart from a purely mechanical one.


What To Do With That


Treat any MAUDE search as a floor, not a rate, a lower bound on what's actually happened rather than a complete picture.


A clean search is not the same as a clean safety record; it may simply mean nobody filed a report.


The FDA's own language is the sentence worth remembering: this data isn't meant to evaluate rates of adverse events or to compare how often they occur across different devices.


icon-autonomy.png

Autonomy

Four robots claim "autonomous." Here's where each one actually sits.

What's actually true about AI, autonomy, and surgical robotics?

Four reports. Every claim checked against FDA filings and peer-reviewed evidence — not press releases.

icon-ai-claims.png

AI

Five FDA-cleared systems. What's cleared, inferred, or just marketing.

The Evidence Library

icon-registry.png

Registry

Nine robots mapped across six levels of autonomy.

icon-roadmap.png

Roadmap

Intuitive's five-layer autonomy roadmap, audited layer by layer.

bottom of page